On 31.12.2007 08:24, Markus wrote:
Am Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:07:15 +0100 schrieb Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net:
On 30.12.2007 21:09, Markus wrote:
The Chip is an EN29F002NT.
What do you think about this patch?
Unfortunately, EN29F002T, EN29F002AT, EN29F002ANT, EN29F002NT all have exactly the same ID. Improve model number printing. Add EN29F002(A)(N)B support while I'm at it. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net
Index: flashrom-eon/flash.h
--- flashrom-eon/flash.h (Revision 3030) +++ flashrom-eon/flash.h (Arbeitskopie) @@ -109,8 +109,8 @@ #define EN_29F040A 0x7F04 #define EN_29LV010 0x7F6E #define EN_29LV040A 0x7F4F /* EN_29LV040(A) */ -#define EN_29F002AT 0x7F92 -#define EN_29F002AB 0x7F97 +#define EN_29F002T 0x7F92 +#define EN_29F002B 0x7F97
#define FUJITSU_ID 0x04 /* Fujitsu */ /* MBM29F400TC_STRANGE has a value not mentioned in the data sheet and we Index: flashrom-eon/flashchips.c =================================================================== --- flashrom-eon/flashchips.c (Revision 3030) +++ flashrom-eon/flashchips.c (Arbeitskopie) @@ -42,9 +42,10 @@ probe_jedec, erase_chip_jedec, write_jedec}, {"At49F002(N)T",ATMEL_ID, AT_49F002NT, 256, 256, probe_jedec, erase_chip_jedec, write_jedec},
- /* The EN29F002AT can do byte program at arbitrary
boundaries. */
- {"EN29F002AT", EON_ID,
EN_29F002AT, 256, 256,
- {"EN29F002(A)(N)T", EON_ID, EN_29F002T,
256, 256, probe_jedec, erase_chip_jedec, write_jedec},
- {"EN29F002(A)(N)B", EON_ID, EN_29F002B,
256, 256,
probe_jedec, erase_chip_jedec, write_jedec},MBM29F400TC_STRANGE, 512, 64 * 1024, probe_m29f400bt, erase_m29f400bt, write_linuxbios_m29f400bt}, {"MX29F002", MX_ID, MX_29F002, 256, 64 * 1024,
I think the patch is okay.
Acked-by: Markus Boas bios@ryven.de
Thanks, r3031.
Regards, Carl-Daniel