Re: [coreboot] device_t vs. struct device*

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

On 11.05.2009 16:04, Myles Watson wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
>  wrote:
> > Maybe renaming the u32 variants of PCI access functions to *_early or so
> > is one way to proceed.
>
> So to avoid as much confusion as possible, should we use struct device
> in functions that should never be called early,

Yes please. It helps a lot when reading the code.
> or should we just
> always use device_t because it is shorter and prettier?

Please don't. The v3 decision to avoid typedefs helped me a lot when I
was trying to understand the device code.

Regards,
Carl-Daniel