On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Elia Yehuda z4ziggy@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Joseph Smith joe@settoplinux.org wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2009 23:09:36 -0400, Corey Osgood corey.osgood@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Elia Yehuda z4ziggy@gmail.com wrote:
here is the comment from my previous patch, revealing most of my RE work
:
/* TODO: This needs to be calculated according to the DRAM tech * (x8, x16, or x32). Argh, Intel provides no docs on this! * Currently, it needs to be pulled from the output of * lspci -xxx Rx92 * here are some common results: * (c = 128MB dual sided, d = 128MB single sided, f = 256MB dual
sided)
* BUFF_SC: tom: drp: DIMM0: DIMM1: * 0x3356 128MB 0x0c 128MB dual-sided - * 0xcc56 128MB 0xc0 - 128MB dual-sided * 0x77da 128MB 0x0d 128MB single-sided - * 0xddda 128MB 0xd0 - 128MB single-sided * 0x0001 256MB 0xcc 128MB dual-sided 128MB dual-sided * 0x55c6 256MB 0xdd 128MB single-sided 128MB single-sided * 0x4445 256MB 0xcd 128MB single-sided 128MB dual-sided * 0x1145 256MB 0xdc 128MB dual-sided 128MB single-sided * 0x3356 256MB 0x0f 256MB dual-sided - * 0xcc56 256MB 0xf0 - 256MB dual-sided * 0x0001 384MB 0xcf 256MB dual-sided 128MB dual-sided * 0x0001 384MB 0xfc 128MB dual-sided 256MB dual-sided * 0x1145 384MB 0xdf 256MB dual-sided 128MB single-sided * 0x4445 384MB 0xfd 128MB single-sided 256MB dual-sided * 0x0001 512MB 0xff 256MB dual-sided 256MB dual-sided * * BUFF_SC: BUFF_SC in binary: tom: drp: DIMM0: DIMM1: * 0x3356 0 0 1 1 00 11 01 01 01 10 128MB 0x0c 128MB dual-sided - * 0xcc56 1 1 0 0 11 00 01 01 01 10 128MB 0xc0
- 128MB dual-sided
* 0x77da 0 1 1 1 01 11 11 01 10 10 128MB 0x0d 128MB single-sided - * 0xddda 1 1 0 1 11 01 11 01 10 10 128MB 0xd0
- 128MB single-sided
* 0x0001 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 01 256MB 0xcc 128MB dual-sided 128MB dual-sided * 0x55c6 0 1 0 1 01 01 11 00 01 10 256MB 0xdd 128MB single-sided 128MB single-sided * 0x4445 0 1 0 0 01 00 01 00 01 01 256MB 0xcd 128MB single-sided 128MB dual-sided * 0x1145 0 0 0 1 00 01 01 00 01 01 256MB 0xdc 128MB dual-sided 128MB single-sided * 0x3356 0 0 1 1 00 11 01 01 01 10 256MB 0x0f 256MB dual-sided - * 0xcc56 1 1 0 0 11 00 01 01 01 10 256MB 0xf0
- 256MB dual-sided
* 0x0001 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 01 384MB 0xcf 256MB dual-sided 128MB dual-sided * 0x0001 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 01 384MB 0xfc 128MB dual-sided 256MB dual-sided * 0x1145 0 0 0 1 00 01 01 00 01 01 384MB 0xdf 256MB dual-sided 128MB single-sided * 0x4445 0 1 0 0 01 00 01 00 01 01 384MB 0xfd 128MB single-sided 256MB dual-sided * 0x0001 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 01 512MB 0xff 256MB dual-sided 256MB dual-sided
0:1 00 = 0 DIMMs 01 = 2 dual 1 dual + 1 single 1 single + 1 dual 10 = 1 DIMM only 2 single 2:3 00 = 2 dual sided 01 = 1 dual sided only 2 single sided 1 dual + 1 single 1 single + 1 dual 10 = 1 single sided only 4:5 00 = 2 DIMMs 01 = 1 DIMM only 6:7 00 = 2 dual 01 = 1 dual only 1 dual + 1 single 1 single + 1 dual 11 = 1 single 2 single 8:9 00 = 2 dual 1 single + 1 dual 1 dual only in slot #1 01 = 1 single only in slot #1 1 dual + 1 single 2 single 11 = no dimm in slot #1 10:11 00 = 1 dual only in slot #0 2 dual 1 dual + 1 single 01 = 1 single only in slot #0 2 single 1 single + 1 dual 11 = no dimm in slot #0 12 0 = 1 dual only in slot #1 2 dual 1 single + 1 dual 1 = no dimm in slot #1 1 single 2 single 1 dual + 1 single 13 0 = any in slot #1 1 = no dimm in slot #1 14 0 = 1 dual only in slot #0 2 dual 1 dual + 1 single 1 = no dimm in slot #0 1 single only in slot #0 2 single 1 single + 1 dual 15 0 = no dimm in slot #1 2 DIMMs 1 = no dimm in slot #0
*/
Wow, cool, I'd never have been able to put that together ;) thanks!
Yes very cool :-)
thanks :)
I am going to have to test this out on the i830. Elia do you need someone with svn access to apply your patch?
sure, but as was suggested by Myles Watson, we'll wait for the HAVE_HIGH_TABLES fix before applying this patch.
I don't want to hold back progress. I think you've done good work. Maybe you could send boot logs to the list and get help to track down the error. I don't have the hardware, but I'd be happy to help some. Could you add a few printks to the calculations of tomk before collecting the logs (with and without HAVE_HIGH_TABLES?
Thanks, Myles