Re: 1.1 development release targets.

[ron minnich]

On 15 Apr 2003, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Steve Gehlbach  writes:
> > What about the alternative floppy/ide routines?
>
> Given that there are several types of rom chips we will
> need to continue to support several types of loaders, not just
> loading from a classic x86 rom chip.  I think the floppy/ide
> routines may be a bit of unnecessary but there is no real impact
> on the rest of the code base.

I think there is going to be continued use of the ide/floppy stuff without 
etherboot. I have requests for that all the time. It's going to have to 
stay.

I support only loading elfboot images from linuxbios. It just makes too 
much sense.

ron