6 Mar
2009
6 Mar
'09
10:56 p.m.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Peter Stuge peter@stuge.se wrote:
ron minnich wrote:
cpu_phase1 and cpu_phase 6 (for example)
Please call it cpu_phase2 instead. Then:
now I see. You want cpu_phase6 to be called cpu_phase2?
Here is why I did not. I want to leave open the possibility that hardware creates a need for other phases. However, I'm not picky on this.
ron