On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger < c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> wrote:
Clearly the FDC37M81x has support now. Should we just leave both of them enabled?
That, or maybe we can use some ID/revision field (or something documented to be zero on one chip and documented to be 1 on the other chip) to differentiate between them?
I couldn't find a FDC37M81x datasheet with those details, and the code documents global register 0x21 as NANA.
I kinda brushed it off as one area where superiotool probably needs more sophisticated probing methods.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger < c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> wrote:
No problem, I was just surprised by the reasoning. You did explain it, and the good thing is that you can test any further differentiators for the code.
The ITE code uses a 16-bit identifier for this info... I wish the SMSC code could do the same :-/