Re: [coreboot] [RFC] Null pointer trap?

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

On 07.11.2008 17:15, ron minnich wrote:
> we can't do this well until we start turning on paging.

True.
> If you want to argue that we 
> should poison memory used by coreboot, I'm good with that.

Poisoning as a default-off option will be forthcoming as a patch.
Default off because it will interfere with Suspend-to-RAM. But for other
cases, it may provide valuable hints. For one, it does make stack size
detection a lot more reliable.

Regards,
Carl-Daniel