On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 09:52:52AM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
I know some people will claim this hurts. But it will hurt the same way when the version number is up to 4, so we better do it now than later:
(This just renames coreboot-v2 to coreboot-devel in the tree) svn mv svn://coreboot.org/repos/trunk/coreboot-v2 \ svn://coreboot.org/repos/trunk/coreboot-devel
Iff we rename "coreboot-v2" I'd prefer "coreboot" instead of "coreboot-devel", the "devel" suggests that it's some kind of unstable dev branch, which it is not. It's the permanently stable one of course :)
Alternatively:
(this moves all sudirectories of coreboot-v2 to trunk and wipes the coreboot-v2 directory as soon as it's empty. Then the directory
I'd rather avoid this, it has too many issues, some of which Carl-Daniel mentioned. Personally I don't think any changes are really necessary. Renaming "coreboot-v2" to "coreboot" is the maximum of what I could live with if there is consensus that we want to rename it to something else. But I don't like the moving/removing of the directories as suggested here very much.
Uwe.