On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 01:55:30AM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
Peter Stuge wrote:
archive.start =(void *)(0UL-archive.len);
Is 0UL good also on 64bit? (Even if it's truncated and "saved" when assigned to archive.start I'd prefer having the size explicitly.)
There will not be a 64bit version of the above code within the next decade. But who says never ;)
My point was that if this is built on amd64 0UL is 64 bit, right? But archive.start is u32 - and we should be more explicit about what we want to accomplish.
//Peter