Re: [coreboot] [flashrom] [patch] Warning in satasii.c with GCC 4.4.0

[Peter Stuge]

Urja Rannikko wrote:
> Now i'm mystified of how the sign-off/ack procedure works when you
> fixed the only change in my patch ... Who should make the new patch
> sign off?

It doesn't matter. Since Carl-Daniel didn't send a new patch or
simply commit with fix, you are more than welcome to send a new
patch with your sigoff. In similar situations, sometimes people
mention input they have received, other times they don't.

//Peter