On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:17:39AM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
For instance, I've seen flashrom logs (-r, -wv, -E, etc) together with their output on some blogs, wikis, mailing lists etc. which are sometimes enough to tell if the board is working OK or not (e.g. requires chipset-enable or board-enable). For these external "scraped" pages we might not be able to find an email address, but it's still useful to add such a tested non-working board to our list until some user shows up in IRC/ML and helps us supporting the board.
Well, in that case, we should still work hard to find contact details so that they don't get lost. If the person is on irc, then you ask him for an email address. If the person is on some forum, it should often be possible to poke this person on this forum too, or at least mention the location of the report in the commit entry.
But yes, in general, we should record who tested a certain board as OK/BAD, if possible with email address.
Ok :)
I think the only reasonable thing to do is to:
- mark the a7n8x deluxe as tested ok.
- remove the a7n8x-e deluxe from the known bad list, but not add it as
tested ok.
That's fine, yes. Removing it from the BAD list is ok, but we should not add it to the OK list, indeed.
Done.
Please feel free to commit.
Ok, thanks a lot, committed as 548.
Luc Verhaegen.