Ping... Comments are welcome...
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Hamo hamo.by@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Jonathan A. Kollasch jakllsch@kollasch.net wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 09:22:39PM +0800, Hamo wrote:
CBFS document is a little old since the structure of it has changed a lot specially CBFS master header. This patch updated the document to show the newest structure of CBFS.
Signed-off-by: Yang Bai hamo.by@gmail.com
Index: documentation/cbfs.txt
--- documentation/cbfs.txt (revision 6534) +++ documentation/cbfs.txt (working copy) @@ -144,10 +144,13 @@ The following is the structure of the master header:
struct cbfs_header {
unsigned int magic;
unsigned int size;
unsigned int align;
unsigned int offset;
u32 magic;
u32 version;
u32 romsize;
u32 bootblocksize;
u32 align;
u32 offset;
u32 pad[2];
};
Any particular reason to not use the C99 uintXX_t types in the docs?
Jonathan Kollasch
I don't know. The code style is a little strange. In file src/include/cbfs.h, uXX is used but in file util/cbfstool/common.h, C99 style is used.
-- """ Keep It Simple,Stupid. """
Chinese Name: 白杨 Nick Name: Hamo Homepage: http://hamobai.com/ GPG KEY ID: 0xA4691A33 Key fingerprint = 09D5 2D78 8E2B 0995 CF8E 4331 33C4 3D24 A469 1A33