Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] Drop W83627THF, it's the same device as W83627THG

[Uwe Hermann]

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:06:23PM -0800, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> Should we rename the part to w83627 then?

That's too generic, many other Winbond Super I/Os start with that prefix:

w83627dhg
w83627ehg
w83627hf
w83627thf
w83627thg
w83627uhg

(and probably some others)

We could do w83627th, or w83627thf_g or so, but I guess it's also fine
to just keep one of the two names. I'll post a follow-up patch which
adds code comments like "This code supports W83627THF/THG" etc. to
all Super I/Os anyway to document this a bit better.

Uwe.