Re: [coreboot] patch: add romfs to V2

[Stefan Reinauer]

On 31.03.2009 4:18 Uhr, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> > > There's another reason to do that. '1' is a common  constants.
> > > 0x31313131 is not. I like to
> > > make important constants have complex values that can be caught from
> > > (e.g.) a JTAG memory dump.
> >
> > What about 0x4c415232 instead? That's "LAR2".
> > > > Can we use some magic other than "ORBC"?
> > >
> > > I don't see the problem, but I'll take a suggestion.
>
> Let's start with working out the name. :)

Yeah, bikesheds first. Then the deed!

Stefan