Re: [coreboot] patch: add romfs to V2

[Peter Stuge]

Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> > There's another reason to do that. '1' is a common  constants.
> > 0x31313131 is not. I like to
> > make important constants have complex values that can be caught from
> > (e.g.) a JTAG memory dump.
>
> What about 0x4c415232 instead? That's "LAR2".
> > > Can we use some magic other than "ORBC"?
> >
> > I don't see the problem, but I'll take a suggestion.

Let's start with working out the name. :)

//Peter