On 14.04.2009 03:29, Richard Smith wrote:
Peter Stuge wrote:
ron minnich wrote:
did you test with abuild :-)
No sir. I have neither procedure nor CPU power for abuild. :\
By the time I would have managed to run abuild once, the server would probably have run abuild thrice, including the two potential rounds of fixes.
Something I've always wondered about is why is abuild only in response to a svn commit? I think it would be quite handy if you had something like abuild-v[23]@coreboot.org and any patch you send as an attachment to it pulls a copy of the tree applies the patch and then runs abuild on the tree and then emails back the results.
Security reasons? What's stopping anyone from mailing a patch which starts a shell on the abuild server which listens on port 12345 or similar fun?
Regards, Carl-Daniel