Re: [coreboot] __attribute__((stdcall)) vs. __attribute__((regparm(0)))

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

On 16.10.2008 17:41, ron minnich wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Myles Watson  wrote:
> > The question is what attribute can be used to make those functions have the
> > normal calling convention when compiling with -mregparm=3.  We're using
> > -mregparm=3 for speed reasons.
>
> The simplest thing: put all the functions that need regparm=0 in one
> file, compile that file with regparm=0

Indeed simple, but it won't work because every function outside this
file, but called from this file will have a calling convention conflict.
The caller will assume regparm(0), the callee will assume regparm(3). Boom.

Myles, please go with __attribute__((regparm(0))) for the functions that
need it.

Regards,
Carl-Daniel