Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] libgcc regparm workaround

[Segher Boessenkool]

> > > I'm worried about any libgcc compiled with regparm!=0, but for  
> > > now this
> > > patch improves the situation.
> >
> > libgcc uses the default calling convention.
>
> Is there an attribute to say "this function uses the default calling
> convention no matter what CFLAGS we have right now"?

Sure, and you're already using that: the default on i386 is regparm=0.

Segher