[coreboot] Re: How to maintain AGESA-based ports long-term?

[Nico Huber]

On 28.11.21 19:54, Nico Huber wrote:
> Oh, and I almost forgot, the board ports don't look like coreboot code.
> There's CamelCase, odd tables in C code (as if there was no devicetree),
> AGESA configuration done in the code of each and every mainboard that
> should be done only once in the chipset code... IMHO it looks like a
> mess. When one is used to coreboot and then sees this, there should
> be no doubt why we have deprecation squabbles ;) This [1] might be
> related. Board ports of other platforms have seen a lot of updates
> over the last ten years, that's not easy for ports where one doesn't
> know what to begin with.

Looks like I forgot the ref here.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broken_windows_theory