On 28.02.2007 00:30, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Add a note that the resulting LinuxBIOS images are licensed under the terms of the GPL, version 2 (trivial).
Not trivial, and the patch did not appear on the list.
Sure it is trivial. It is just documenting a fact. It was discussed before, too.
Maybe I missed it, but when did the v2/v2+ discussion take place? Or is this just a symptom of sleep deprivation on my side?
Plus, it did not have the ack of another person.
It's trivial. Someone can un-ack and revert it if needed ;-)
But what's the point in Acked-by then? We can always revert if needed.
Regards, Carl-Daniel