16 May
2007
16 May
'07
12:52 a.m.
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 03:58:40PM -0400, Corey Osgood wrote:
Hmm, why don't we just fix raminit.c and debug.c (and northbridge.c, if applicable) for those northbridges (vt8601, vt8623, 440bx) to just use smbus_read_byte instead of spd_read_byte? Eliminate any chance of a problem altogether?
spd_read_byte() is the correct name, so it should stay IMO. Is there a reason why all/most boards define this as a wrapper for smbus_read_byte()?
Could this be something else than smbus_read_byte() for some board? If no, maybe a #define is easier? Or move the wrapper to a central location?
Uwe.