Re: [coreboot] Resource allocator in v2

[Myles Watson]

> > > I've had a few complaints about the stage numbering/naming in v3 ....
> > > would you preserve that or ...
> >
> > The naming is unimportant to me as long as it's clear that we:
> > Read resources
> > Allocate them
> > Write them to hardware
> >
> > Last time I asked for suggestions there was no consensus on good names.
>
> Then stick with the v2 names.

Since v2 has one compute_allocate_resource it will become compute_resource
and allocate resource then.

Thanks,
Myles