Re: [coreboot] CONFIG_ about which messages to compile in

[Peter Stuge]

Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> The log level is now given with an argument, so it's trickier to
> get the code excluded from the binary completely.

Maybe split it up then? (But _only_ statics within the printk code!)
> Likely can coerce gcc to do that with specially crafted code.

I would prefer to avoid that.

//Peter