On 20.04.2009 15:25, Peter Stuge wrote:
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Should I now revert the table part of the patch because I nak it and the original conversion to multiline had more acks than the conversion back to single-line? Sorry, but this is just silly.
I hope you agree with Luc's and my points about how the wider format is preferable.
Not really. AFAICS the wide vs. multiline issue is what the disagreement is about. After all , I acked the original conversion to multiline because I didn't like the 2-line format.
Is there any reason to hold off committing my own non-1.0 patches?
I don't know. Which do you mean? Is it those things in that other thread, where some are in trac but you also had some good new tickets?
The majority of these patches have no trac entry.
There is too much to keep trac(k) of and the list isn't a great tracker for me. Sorry. :\
I prefer tracking issues on a list because it works even when I'm offline. That's probably why the patches each of us has in mind differs a lot. Sorry. I didn't mean to have you look for stuff which isn't where you look.
(Did trac get the mail-patches-to-list feature in the meantime?)
Regards, Carl-Daniel