Stefan Reinauer wrote:
Maybe would be better to have ACPI minimalistic, but usable.
Which parts are not usable?
I think the intention was "the bare minimum" - as it stands that ACPI implementation is a bit, eh, fat.
I have to say it's the most readable ASL I've seen though.
Some of the fat could go into mainboard specific ASL rather than have everything in the chipset dirs. But maybe that's a bad idea? It does go against my idea of keeping code out of the mainboard dir..
Dunno..
//Peter