14 Oct
2008
14 Oct
'08
1:15 p.m.
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
I believe the stage0_main name is misleading. After all, stage0 is pure asm and lives in its own .S file.
let's call it stage1 then and main()
Works for me.
I'm afraid I don't like that.
Please suggest something that makes the timeline obvious. I think we already have other problems like this in v3.
I would be OK with adding phases to stage1 e.g. but I have also contemplated flattening the stage/phase tree to only have stages and no phases - though that doesn't have to happen right now.
//Peter