On Thursday, January 23, 2014 10:59:21 PM Paul Menzel wrote:
Do you also know if GRUB 2 does not fulfill one of these requirements?
GRUB2 doesn't meet several requirements that vendors usually have: * must be crappily coded (ignoring the GNU coding standard here) * code must be unreadable to the casual trained observer * must be full of redundancy * must contain many superfluous functions * must be hard to get working (vendors want to add value, right?) * requires Visual Studio to compile
I can't speak for older versions of GRUB2, but 2.02 beta fails to fulfill any and all of the above requirements.
Alex