Re: [coreboot] Questions about CBFS

[Hamo]

On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Georgi, Patrick
 wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 16.06.2011, 21:50 +0800 schrieb Hamo:
> We thought it's a good idea to mandate _some_ default, otherwise we'd
> risk having incompatible image formats created by the same tool.

You mean that we use MSB as default now?
> Question is if we should define native endianess per platform and let
> cbfstool take care of things (instead of coreboot at runtime), adding a
> flag to the CBFS header (which would have to be properly specified so
> things are clear)

A new question:
Why we use a binary file to create the rom but using an ELF to add a
stage to this rom?

Thanks,
Hamo