Re: [coreboot] FILO bug disk not seen at ata-0 (Doesn't try to detect on ATA only SIL3114)

[Xavi Drudis Ferran]

> SeaBIOS is not slow - it is smaller than filo (both compressed and
> uncompressed) and loads and initializes faster than filo.  During one
> of my tests, SeaBIOS was 1.5 seconds faster to the boot menu than
> filo.

I didn't mean SeaBIOS is slow. I meant loading it from disk would be slower
than loading it from Flash. But from other replies I see there is not much
of a use case for that.