On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 10:01:36PM +0200, Harald Gutmann wrote:
The last patch had a mistake somewhere because patch complains about a malform patch format.
This one is the same, and just comments have been modified slightly.
OK, so this one makes the second (black) pcie x16 slot happy:
[ 6.126711] 0000:02:00.0: eth2: (PCI Express:2.5GB/s:Width x4) 00:15:17:0b:d4:9e [ 6.128034] 0000:02:00.0: eth2: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection [ 6.132110] 0000:02:00.0: eth2: MAC: 0, PHY: 4, PBA No: d50868-001 [ 6.136087] e1000e 0000:02:00.1: setting latency timer to 64 [ 6.318689] 0000:02:00.1: eth3: (PCI Express:2.5GB/s:Width x4) 00:15:17:0b:d4:9f [ 6.320033] 0000:02:00.1: eth3: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection [ 6.324106] 0000:02:00.1: eth3: MAC: 0, PHY: 4, PBA No: d50868-001
I tested by copying a large (400M) file at wirespeed from both of those interfaces. No problems.
I also have an old 3com nic in this machine, in one of the PCI slots (the one closest to the edge). I also copied that large file from that nic, without problems.
However, I got this after having the machine up for a while:
[ 999.664992] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 00. [ 999.665144] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason a1. [ 999.665147] You have some hardware problem, likely on the PCI bus. [ 999.665149] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue [ 999.667309] Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled? [ 999.667309] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
This was right after I did
cat /proc/interrupts
a couple times - but that may have been a coincidence.
Ideas?
Thanks, Ward.