Hey Carl,
On Tuesday 12 May 2009 10:59:28 Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Hi Christian,
thanks for your patch.
A detailed review follows. Don't let the review discourage you, Makefiles are always controversial. It is entirely possible someone will post a different review which tells you all changes are good.
On 09.05.2009 04:32, Christian Ruppert wrote:
Hey guys,
I wrote a patch which includes some Makefile improvements so please review.
Signed-off-by: Christian Ruppert spooky85@gmail.com
Index: Makefile
--- Makefile (revision 483) +++ Makefile (working copy) @@ -8,12 +8,16 @@
CC ?= gcc STRIP = strip -INSTALL = /usr/bin/install -PREFIX = /usr/local +INSTALL = install +PREFIX ?= /usr/local +DESTDIR =
Any reason to clear DESTDIR?
Well, no need to re-define DESTDIR.
#CFLAGS = -O2 -g -Wall -Werror -CFLAGS = -Os -Wall -Werror -LDFLAGS = +CFLAGS ?= -Os -Wall -Werror
Hm. Not completely sure about making CFLAGS conditional. I like it, though. Could you kill the commented out CFLAGS line?
It is useful if you have *FLAGS in your environment instead of passing all *FLAGS directly to the Makefile. The commented out stuff was already there so i just kept it.
+prefix = $(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX) +man8dir = $(prefix)/share/man/man8 +sbindir = $(prefix)/sbin
OS_ARCH = $(shell uname) ifneq ($(OS_ARCH), SunOS) STRIP_ARGS = -s @@ -27,7 +31,7 @@ LDFLAGS += -L/usr/local/lib endif
-LDFLAGS += -lpci -lz +LIBS += -lpci
OK.
OBJS = chipset_enable.o board_enable.o udelay.o jedec.o stm50flw0x0x.o \ sst28sf040.o am29f040b.o mx29f002.o sst39sf020.o m29f400bt.o \ @@ -45,11 +49,11 @@
| sed -e "s/.*://" -e "s/\([0-9]*\).*/\1/")"'
$(PROGRAM): $(OBJS)
- $(CC) -o $(PROGRAM) $(OBJS) $(LDFLAGS)
- $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) -o $(PROGRAM) $(OBJS) $(LIBS) $(STRIP) $(STRIP_ARGS) $(PROGRAM)
While you're touching this code, can you move the stripping to a separate rule so it is possible to create unstripped binaries? Distributions want that.
Of course.
flashrom.o: flashrom.c
- $(CC) -c $(CFLAGS) $(SVNDEF) $(CPPFLAGS) $< -o $@
- $(CC) -c $(CFLAGS) $(SVNDEF) $< -o $@
Any reason to remove the CPPFLAGS (C preprocessor flags) from the flashrom rule?
Oops, I read it as CXXFLAGS %)
clean: rm -f $(PROGRAM) *.o @@ -58,25 +62,26 @@ rm -f .dependencies
dep:
- @$(CC) $(SVNDEF) -MM *.c > .dependencies
- @$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(SVNDEF) -MM *.c > .dependencies
In theory, CFLAGS should not be needed here and CPPFLAGS be used instead.
I wasn't sure if they're really needed there.
pciutils:
- @echo; printf "Checking for pciutils and zlib... "
- @echo; printf "Checking for pciutils... " @$(shell ( echo "#include <pci/pci.h>"; \ echo "struct pci_access *pacc;"; \ echo "int main(int argc, char **argv)"; \ echo "{ pacc = pci_alloc(); return 0; }"; ) > .test.c )
- @$(CC) $(CFLAGS) .test.c -o .test $(LDFLAGS) >/dev/null 2>&1 && \
- @$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) .test.c -o .test $(LIBS) >/dev/null 2>&1
&& \ echo "found." || ( echo "not found."; echo; \
echo "Please install pciutils-devel and zlib-devel."; \
echo "See README for more information."; echo; \ rm -f .test.c .test; exit 1) @rm -f .test.c .testecho "Please install pciutils-devel."; \
There are pciutils versions out there where compiling any file with pci/pci.h also requires zlib headers (but not zlib itself). This has to stay unchanged. Sorry. Think of it as a workaround for old broken software releases still present on soe of today's systems.
install: $(PROGRAM)
- $(INSTALL) $(PROGRAM) $(PREFIX)/sbin
- mkdir -p $(PREFIX)/share/man/man8
- $(INSTALL) $(PROGRAM).8 $(PREFIX)/share/man/man8
- $(INSTALL) -d $(sbindir)
- $(INSTALL) -d $(man8dir)
The -d switch for install is not supported everywhere, but mkdir -p works everywhere AFAIK.
I'm not familiar with other architectures etc. so i re-added mkdir.
- $(INSTALL) -m 0755 $(PROGRAM) $(sbindir)
- $(INSTALL) -m 0644 $(PROGRAM).8 $(man8dir)
Not sure about -m, but it seems to be supported in all systems I checked.
.PHONY: all clean distclean dep pciutils
Overall, this is a patch in the right direction.
Regards, Carl-Daniel
Thanks!
Signed-off-by: Christian Ruppert spooky85@gmail.com
Regards, Christian Ruppert