* Uwe Hermann uwe@hermann-uwe.de [070515 17:46]:
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 12:28:55PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 10:26:54AM +0000, svn@openbios.org wrote:
static inline int spd_read_byte(unsigned device, unsigned address) {
- uint8_t c;
- c = smbus_read_byte(device, address);
- return c;
- return smbus_read_byte(device, address);
Should they return uint8_t perhaps?
Yes, I think so. AFAIK smbus works with byte values (or at least smbus_read_byte() does), and SPD data consists of bytes, too...
Most other romcc functions have no sized variables, but just signed/unsigned.
I would assume spd_read_byte should be at least unsigned though.
Can anyone confirm romcc creates different code if you choose uint8_t or unsigned or unsigned int as a return type?
Stefan