I have made two observations concerning 'buildtargets':
1) Romcc is generated in duplicate in fallback/ as well as normal/. Is this necessary? Both executable have identical md5-hashes. I do at least modify by hand the target 'normal/clean' to leave romcc for the next round of compilations. I would have expected the python generator to produce such alternatives by itself.
2) The dependencies of most targets are so shallow, that it is almost inevitable to perform a full clean in order to assemble a new normal.rom or fallback.rom, even after the smallest of changes. Is this intentional?
Regards,
Mats Erik Andersson