On 12.11.2007 18:07, Marc Jones wrote:
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
while taking a look at stage0 and stage1 code in v3, I was surprised to see no coherent structure in the code for Geode LX boards. While some of this may be due to dead code, I'd like to know:
- which board can serve as structural reference
- which board is working best.
Once I know that, I can send cleanup patches and maybe even kill a few functions and files.
I use the amd/norwich and Ron uses the adl/msm800sev. The norwich mainboard is more generic but they should be very similar to each other. The artecgroup mainboard is incomplete.
Thanks for the info! I'll proceed with structural unification of the adl/msm800sev and amd/norwich mainboards and make the artec/dbe61 conform to their style.
As I work through the code, I will generate a stream of patches, mostly for documentation and cleanup.
Do you have boot logs with maximum verbosity for the msm800sev or the norwich? If I can see them, I have a chance to improve debug printout as well.
Regards, Carl-Daniel