Re: [coreboot] [PATCH 5/5] Be less noisy in ram_check in non-debug loglevels

[ron minnich]

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:24 PM, Corey Osgood  wrote:
> If you're running it in production code to detect the ram size, do you
> really want to send an error message after you find the (expected) end of
> ram? In other words, do you want to have an error message show up on every
> boot displaying an error message about a ram failure, and the address of
> that failure, that an end user (familiar only with typical BIOSes) might
> believe to be a bad thing?

yes, a thing that is not an error should never look like an error ...

ron