Hi,
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 10:48:33PM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
Speaking of the DCO, we are using the verbatim text of the DCO 1.1 but we have renamed it to "LinuxBIOS Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1" on the wiki page.
Good point.
Was that intentional?
Yes, but that was wrong. I renamed it because I misread the 'If you modify you must use a name or title distinguishable from "Developer's Certificate of Origin"' below. If we do _not_ modify the DCO, we can still also keep the name (that's how I understand it at least).
I reverted my renaming, it's called "Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1" again now. Thanks for pointing that out.
The original DCO has the following copyright notice: "© 2005 Open Source Development Labs, Inc. The Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. If you modify you must use a name or title distinguishable from "Developer's Certificate of Origin" or "DCO" or any confusingly similar name."
Uwe.