-----Original Message----- From: Marc.Karasek@Sun.COM [mailto:Marc.Karasek@Sun.COM] Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 10:34 AM To: Jordan Crouse Cc: Myles Watson; coreboot@coreboot.org Subject: Re: SimNOW V2 LAB problem
Good News I just tried coreboot-v3 with the same system and it does compile...
Yes. It's weird. I can even compile v2 with an identical toolchain (release versions) on my x86_64 box.
Here's the original thread.
http://coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2008-February/029993.html
Thanks, Myles
Marc Karasek MTS Sun Microsystems mailto:marc.karasek@sun.com ph:770.360.6415
Jordan Crouse wrote:
On 09/05/08 11:41 -0400, Marc Karasek wrote:
Jordan,
I d/l buildrom to my notebook to build a 32bit version to try it with SimNOW. It compiles but gets a linker error : <coreboot: section `.ram' can't be allocated in segment 0> Any thoughts on what could be causing this???
This is from coreboot itself? That sounds really evil. We clearly have some major toolchain churn here.
Marc
Marc Karasek MTS Sun Microsystems mailto:marc.karasek@sun.com ph:770.360.6415
Jordan Crouse wrote:
On 08/05/08 20:32 -0400, Ward Vandewege wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 03:52:21PM -0600, Myles Watson wrote:
> Disregard my feeble wanderings.. I was thinking about my attempt
to
> move busybox to 1.10.1 and the problems I was seeing there. > > I think though the two are related. Seems that uClibc 0.9.29 no
longer
> supports the toolchain wrappers for -nostdlib and forcing a linking > with > native tools (gcc/binutils) and a compiled uClibc library. This
was
> pulled in 0.9.22 according to the uclibc FAQ. Maybe it was just a
one
> off that FC5 still worked. > Strange. It worked for 0.9.28 as well. Those are the two versions
I've
used in buildrom.
Ward: You've used lab haven't you? What toolchain do you use?
Yep, I've got LAB systems running. I build on gNewsense deltad
typically,
which is basically Ubuntu Dapper, 32 bit.
It might be time for us to ping the uClibc / busybox teams for some guidance.
Jordan