Re: [coreboot] [RFC] flashrom and coreboot tables

[Peter Stuge]

Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Right now, flashrom assumes that if a coreboot table exists, the
> board NEEDS a board specific enable function. If there is none
> (because it is not needed), flashrom will complain.
>
> Three options are available to solve this:
> Leave the code as-is and confuse developers and users alike.
> Add info to the coreboot table that the board doesn't need any
>
> special flash enabling.
> 3. Provide dummy functions for every board supported by coreboot.

4. Remove the table lookup completely.
5. Make flashrom continue silently instead of complaining.

I prefer either of 4 or 5 over 1-3.

//Peter