Do we have criteria on which to decide if quark is worth keeping? Is there a deadline for the work? At some point, you're going to find code changing out from under you; are you committing to be the maintainer?
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 7:45 AM Angel Pons th3fanbus@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Andy,
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 2:19 PM Andy Pont andy.pont@sdcsystems.com wrote:
Ron wrote…
so how's it going?
Slowly! The day job has got in the way a bit but I have been struggling to build the FSP binaries based on the instructions at [1]. I’m not sure whether that is down to me not fully understanding the instructions (always possible) or whether there is work-in-progress that needs to be completed.
I managed to build the FSP 1.1 binary using the six year old version of edk2 that Lee also has on his GitHub using an Ubuntu 16.04 development machine. I haven’t yet managed to find a way to successful build the FSP 2.0 binary. Trying to build EDK2 BaseTools throws a pile of Python syntax errors which may or may not be critical. I’ve assumed they aren’t for now and am working on getting the binary to build.
Instructions on how to build QuarkFsp were added here: https://review.coreboot.org/29029
-Andy.
Best regards, Angel