On 02/03/2011 10:17 AM, Josef Kellermann wrote:
e are at it. I'm attaching some very old patch (r2978 ;) which contains some errata fixes too, if you have some spare time please try to check if it is correct.
Signed-off-by: Rudolf Marek r.marek@assembler.cz
Thanks, Rudolf
Hi, are you sure ?
You're right:
AMD Publication #33610, page34
"[Regarding erratum #131] Systems implementing the workaround for erratum #169 should not apply this workaround."
So it seems AMD recommends either or, but not both.
Page 59: "[Regarding erratum #169] The workaround for this erratum supersedes the workaround for erratum #131. When implementing this workaround, the workaround for erratum #131 should not be applied."
So we better implement only 169, and explain in the comments why 131 is left out.
Alex