Hi,
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:14:06PM +0000, Sean Young wrote:
- int16_t magic;
This can be uint16_t right? Or is there some reason to make it signed explicitly?
There is no need for it to be signed. Unsigned makes more sense actually.
Fixed.
Patch comitted in r4931, thanks! I also updated the wiki and linked to your sample dump there.
Uwe.