On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Stefan Reinauer stepan@coresystems.de wrote:
On 30.04.2009 15:29 Uhr, Ward Vandewege wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 02:37:14PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
Myles Watson wrote:
I don't know how to fix it though. Does anyone have an idea?
Kevin already added an img/ path for payloads. I guess he could add a path for ROM-style images (ones that will return.) They'd have to be numbered so that they were executed in order, but that doesn't seem like too much of a problem.
I think that's a great idea!
Yeah, same here!
With all the infrastructure in the CBFS format, I think encoding duplicate information in the file names is not an appropriate approach. Instead the existing infrastructure should be used.
Care to elaborate? I don't see ordering information or whether the ROM returns in CBFS.
Thanks, Myles