Marc/Jordan/Ron,
could you take a look at the question at the end of this mail?
On 08.05.2008 07:39, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
On 07.05.2008 23:28, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
Here's a patch that fixes DBE61 target compilation by making irq_tables.h take the v3 approach. It might actually work on hardware regarding interrupt setup, but we need to get the raminit to work properly to see... so this is in the name of compilation fix and common sense that as all the IRQ routing is the same in DBE61 and DBE62, that the routing settings in dbe62 code should be fine for dbe61 as well.
Well, if the IRQ routing is the same in DBE61 and DBE62, why do the tables differ after your patch?
They differ in the interrupt router and IRQs devoted fields only, as told in the proposed commit message on top of the attachment together with the reason. And the vendor/device are AMD instead of NSC I believe. The interrupt line routing tuples are the same and it makes it compile and not worse.
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net
What does "IRQs devoted exclusively to PCI usage" value affect?
No idea.
Regards, Carl-Daniel