Myles Watson wrote:
Support for the Intel 945 northbridge.
Sorry I'm late. I know it's already in, but I was in the middle of reviewing it. I prefixed my comments with //, I hope that helps you
find
them faster.
Ok, trying to address the issues:
Thanks. It makes it more motivating to do future reviews.
//Consistency with \r\n ...
- printk_debug("ok\r\n");
+}
+static void i945_setup_egress_port(void) +{
- u32 reg32;
- u32 timeout;
//and just \n
Which one is the right one to use these days?
I think the consensus was just \n. That's what v3 uses all the way through.
Thanks, Myles