10 Feb
2009
10 Feb
'09
5:49 p.m.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Peter Stuge peter@stuge.se wrote:
ron minnich wrote:
You have to rewrite all the printk functions to be macros again. It's a bit more work than changing one setting.
But it shouldn't be too bad, right?
Just one printk function should need changing, and only at the definition.
It should not be too bad. I just want to make sure that everyone on the list understands what we are going to change.
Getting rid of the printk macro, and having all printk messages always available, was viewed as a reform from v2. We're essentially reforming the reform :-)
ron