On 3/1/10 3:57 PM, Patrick Georgi wrote:
It might be a good thing to compare tyan/s2912_fam10 (if that's indeed the ancestor) and this board, to identify common parts that could be factored out - we have a live example, with small divergence inbetween.
Everything we get done now will simplify the job for the next board, as every feature not to maintain is an issue less for the developer to care about.
Any takers?
A great unification would also be to stop having a different target for FAM10 and non-FAM10 boards. This is more complicated for users than a bit of duplicated code. (And it will bite us again for Fam10 + x, and for Nehalem and co, basically for every chipset with a memory controller in the CPU instead of on the board)
So how do we fix our device model, which still assumes a board has exactly one choice of memory controller?
Stefan