Re: [LinuxBIOS] PATCH: GPL Header for som/ims/p2b code.

[Ronald G Minnich]

Uwe Hermann wrote:
> Wait, the actual license is the GPL? It doesn't say so anywhere, so that
> definately needs to be clarified. As I understood things until now, was
> that the LANL-text is in itself a license, namely a BSD-ish one.
> Would LANL agree to relicense their code to GPL, and/or remove the
> BSD-ish text? It's really confusing...

it's weird, but the LANL code is gpl.

so we just add it in.

ron