On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Corey Osgood corey.osgood@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com wrote:
This is the start of a v3 superio refactoring, more will follow. Build-tested on one or two targets.
for fintek: -static void pnp_enter_conf_state(struct device *dev) -{
outb(0x87, dev->path.pnp.port);
-}
pnp_enter_conf_state(dev);
pnp_enter_8787(dev);
I don't know that much about SuperIOs, but does it matter that you replaced one outb with two?
No, it doesn't, I've used two 0x87s on actual hardware.
-Corey
Good to know. Interesting that the second one matters to the ite chip.
Thanks, Myles
At least in pnp_enter_ite() it seems to matter.
Besides that it looks good.
Acked-by: Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com