On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 08:05:39PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
At least we want to change the commit trigger so abuild doesn't run for anything but v2 commits then. Maybe this is done already? :)
Not for util?
I think this is tough. If we pack lar there, v3 should definitely be recompiled when someone changes lar.
Maybe, yes. But maybe this even works; depends on how the post-commit hooks "see" the changes in an svn:externals repo within v3.
But I agree that we could change the abuild hooks to only "fire" if there was a change in the LinuxBIOSv2/ directory or below.
For v3 there's no abuild at the moment anyway.
-- there are some tutorials on how to do that while preserving the history.
Do you have URLs at hand?
It's not hard to merge two repos. It might mean that you guys all have to do a fresh checkout though... ;) So I better want to be very sure we all want this.
Yep, if we want to take the history with us, then yes, I think we want this.
Yes, we would _not_ have the history in that new LinuxBIOSv3 directory. But maybe it's still an option
The only reason for doing it that way is to get it done. I think it would be nice if we could get the history over. Dunno?
If we really do so, we want the history over, yes. Definitely.
I'd rather go as far as moving util to the v3 tree (including history) and pushing off v1 and v2.
Uh, no, rather the other way around (merge v3 into the current v1/v2/util repo).
We seemed pretty sure we want a fresh repo and not just a fresh directory at the linuxbios symposium last year... did the mood change here?
Yep :) Mine changed definately.
Uwe.