Re: [coreboot] Drivers vs. Objects

[Myles Watson]

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Peter Stuge  wrote:
> Myles Watson wrote:
> > > > Should I2C devices use objects, since you can't scan for them?
> > Making it a driver seems easier to enforce/explain since it provides an
> > *_ops struct.
>
> On the other hand a phony ops struct is bad in so many ways. Less is
> more, no?

My impression was that the ops struct works fine, but you can't scan for it
because I2C is missing the equivalent of PCI vendor/device IDs.  In what way
is the ops struct phony?

Thanks,
Myles